Originally Posted by rusty well normally in sotw sizes are 400 x 250 max |
the one I posted is 400x250 exactly.
Originally Posted by rusty if there is a clip there is a small window of it like you have previously done |
that really depends where you look.
http://www.pickaforum.com/i/index.ph...nipers&act=idx
have a look there
Originally Posted by rusty sound is generally kept out of sigs because if you had 20 different people posting a sig with sound it would be very annoying |
again depends where you look, but there wasnt any rule saying you couldnt use sound, I couldve made it where you had to click to play it, but many ppl wouldnt have realised and wouldnt have clicked, if this was a sig I was going to use thats what I wouldve done.
Originally Posted by rusty personally which in my own opinion is that sigs should be your own lt\ittle piece of art not a movie with some text
yes you did fill the topic perfectly i guess with confidence
but to me there is no emotion into creating that sig
well theres my opinion again |
how many sigs have you created where it was your art? did you draw that pic of Kate? what of the others? im more than sure Ive seen parts of your other ones around before, in fact im sure I have the wallpaper versions of some of them.
and your right, there was no emotion into creating that sig, the topic was to show emotion, not use it.
Originally Posted by rusty leebe i like your current sig ithink its cool did you make the fish if so thats great |
no I didnt, in fact a lot more work went into the one I made for this thread.
Originally Posted by rusty but playing a movie wih text is not a sig and you could niether put tht in your sig it is too big and contains sound maybe a link to it so it doesnt play on forums well gl and may the best abd fairest person win |
of course its a sig, even GK has/had a bit of a movie in his sig, does it make it any less a sig?, a sig is anything in the "signature" area. would I use this one? probably not as it is now, but apart from the sound there is nothing wrong with it, It fits all the rules...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_block
"On web forums, the rules are often less strict on how a signature block is formatted, as Web browsers typically are not operated within the same constraints as text interface applications. Users will typically use a "signature" text area in their given profile for input, which can then allow a user to turn off signatures. Depending on the board's capabilities, signatures may range from a simple line or two of text to an elaborately-constructed HTML piece. Images are often allowed as well, including dynamically updated images, usually hosted remotely and modified by a server-side script.
Signatures are seen as an art form by many of their creators, and there are many websites centered around their creation and display. Most of these websites have competitions, battles and a signature of the week contest, where members submit their entries to have them featured on the main page."
take a look here
http://www.gamereplays.org/community...?showforum=984
or google for "signature of the week" - the range is excellent
seems to me youre just a bit huffy, but my sigs are as original as yours are and they fit to the rules of the thread. should the rules be changed? maybe for the future they should be more clearly defined as to what exactly is acceptable, for eg, should you be allowed to rip other ppls work and just edit a bit with photoshop? should every piece be original? I guess thats up to our hosts here.
